Did We Ever Really Leave the EU?

Back in 2013, when I first wrote about the EU, the whole thing already felt like theatre. Politicians shouting about sovereignty, newspapers pumping out fear and fantasy, and the public being marched from one narrative to the next like a flock waiting for instructions. Even then, it was obvious: whatever happened, Britain was never going to make a clean break. We were already too tangled in the wiring.

More than a decade later, the question hits harder — did we truly leave, or did we just rebrand the relationship and hope no one looked too closely?

We still trade under EU rules. We still align with EU standards. We still negotiate access to EU systems. Our planes, our data, our supply chains — all tied to Europe like an umbilical cord we pretend we cut.

Brexit was sold as a door slamming shut. In reality, it was a door left ajar with a “Do Not Disturb” sign hanging off it. Independence in speeches, interdependence in practice. A political magic trick: distract the audience with slogans while the machinery behind the curtain keeps running exactly as before.

Maybe that’s the truth we weren’t supposed to notice. Maybe we never really left — we just stepped sideways.

And now, looking back at that old post, it’s clear the writing was already on the wall. The UK was always going to end up half in, half out, orbiting the EU like a planet that escaped the system but never the gravity.

Some people call that failure. Some call it compromise. I call it exactly what it always was: the illusion of choice.

Sheep Free Zone Think for yourself — no flock required.        More of My work 

Is a degree worth it?

The Degree Illusion

Degree or no degree: that is the question.

I’ve come to realise that having a degree these days is like having a front door — everyone’s got one. It’s no longer the key that sets you apart.

So how do employers dig deeper to find out who’s genuinely suited for the job? Many now rely on behavioural questions. But if you’ve sat through ten interviews with the same script, it’s easy to learn the lines and give the answers they want to hear.

For example:

• Tell us about a time you overcame a problem while working as part of a team.
• Describe how you handled a difficult customer and what you did to resolve it.
• Tell us about a time you had to manage your own behaviour for the good of your employer.

These questions can be blagged, especially by someone who knows how to sell themselves.

The best interview process I ever experienced was with Thomson Holidays back in 2005. We arrived and were placed in a holding area, unaware that we were being watched on CCTV. They weren’t just looking at our CVs — they were observing how we interacted. Did we sit quietly in a corner, or did we introduce ourselves to the others?

Then came the group tasks, followed by a five-minute presentation to test our public speaking. Every move was observed. My CV got me through the door, but the proof was in the pudding.

Hiring me turned out to be the right choice. Not only was I great with customers, but my public speaking skills — honed years earlier — made me one of the top sellers of excursions.

And here’s the thing: this isn’t just my story.

My sister grafted her way through a teaching degree as a mature student — full respect for that. But her real success came later, working for Save the Children, helping extract hundreds of millions from corporations desperate to polish their public image.

A teaching degree can’t teach you how to do that. That’s persuasion. That’s strategy. That’s understanding people. That’s experience — the kind you only get by being in the trenches, not in a lecture hall.

Her story proves the point just as clearly as mine: A degree might open a door, but it’s attitude, behaviour, and real-world experience that keep you in the room.

What do you think — does a degree still matter, or has it become just another box to tick?

Other Questions People Ask About Degrees

• Is a degree worth it in 2026?
• Which degrees have the best job prospects?
• Does my degree subject affect my salary?
• How do I choose the right degree?
• Should I change my degree? More

S&DR Heritage trail Bishop Auckland

Why Broom Mill Farm is the ultimate pit-stop for walkers, cyclists, and history buffs.

A Journey Through Railway History

The Stockton & Darlington Railway (S&DR) isn't just a path; it’s a walk through the dawn of the modern world. Starting from the Locomotion Museum in Shildon, the trail winds through the beautiful Durham countryside, following the very tracks that changed transport forever in 1825.

As you trek toward the historic Gaunless Bridge abutments, you’re walking in the footsteps of pioneers. But every great explorer needs a place to refuel.

The 200-Yard Detour You Won’t Regret

We know the feeling—you’re a few miles into your hike, the North East breeze is picking up, and you’re dreaming of a hot barista coffee or a thick farmhouse sandwich.

Find us just 200 yards off the main S&DR line. Look for the Broom Mill Farm signs near the St Helen Auckland stretch. It’s a short detour that leads to a big reward:

• Lakeside Views: Rest your legs by our tranquil lake.

• The Mill Kitchen: Hearty, home-cooked meals made with produce from our own farm shop.

• 100% Dog Friendly: We love walkers, and we love their four-legged companions even more! Our outdoor seating is designed for you and your dog to relax together.

Beyond the Railway: The Saints & Romans

Broom Mill Farm isn't just for railway fans. We sit at the crossroads of some of Durham’s most iconic routes:

1. The Northern Saints’ Trails: Follow the ancient paths of pilgrims.

2. The Roman Road: Head south toward Piercebridge and discover the remains of Roman forts.

3. Barnard Castle: A favorite route for local cyclists looking for a scenic challenge.

Plan Your Visit

Whether you’re starting your journey with a full farmhouse breakfast or ending a long hike with a slice of homemade cake, we are here to make your trail experience even better.

Pro Tip: Stock up on local snacks and water at our Farm Shop before you tackle the "Final Incline" toward Toft Hill—you’ll thank us when you reach the top!

my Website

Who Really stopped The Atlantic Slave Trade?

The Great Forgery: How the British Working Class Fractured the Slave Empire

Modern historical narratives, carefully curated by corporate-state controllers, love to project a shadow of collective national guilt over the ordinary population of Great Britain. A systematic campaign of cultural conditioning forces the descendants of the British working class to believe that their ancestors were the architects, owners, and beneficiaries of global human slavery.

It is a profound, calculated lie.

The ordinary people who dug the coal, laid the iron tracks, and operated the textile looms of industrial Britain did not own plantations. They did not own shipping syndicates. They did not even own the land beneath their own boots, living instead under a system of industrial serfdom that exploited their labor from cradle to grave.

When the true, unvarnished history of the abolitionist movement is laid bare, it reveals a completely different reality: the global slave trade was not dismantled by the moral benevolence of the ruling elite. It was systematically choked to death by the fierce, organic, and agonizing sacrifices of the British working class.

Phase I: The Avalanche of Paper (1787–1814)

While institutional history textbooks attribute the destruction of the slave trade entirely to parliamentary politicians like William Wilberforce, the actual structural engine of abolition was the power of the mass petition, a weapon engineered entirely by ordinary, disenfranchised citizens.

In the late eighteenth century, the British working class possessed no voting rights, no political representation, and no leverage within a corrupt parliament dominated by West Indian plantation barons and wealthy merchants. Recognising their isolation, they turned to the only weapon available to them: collective solidarity on paper.

The scale of this mobilisation was unprecedented in human history:

• The Manchester Crusade (1787): In an era when Manchester was a gruelling industrial hub, over 10,000 ordinary working men signed a single petition demanding the immediate abolition of the slave trade. One-fifth of the entire city’s population put their names to the parchment, risking the ire of the powerful mill owners.
• The Flood of 1792: In a single year, ordinary communities across Britain flooded the House of Commons with 519 distinct anti-slavery petitions. The sheer volume of parchment overwhelmed the building, with clerks forced to pile the rolls on the floor.
• The Avalanche of 1814: When the ruling elite threatened to allow the slave trade to resurrect under peacetime conditions, citizens marched door-to-door through the mud, taverns, and chapel halls to collect more than 800,000 signatures in just over one month.

This was the first true mass human rights campaign the world had ever witnessed. It was an organic, community-led siege that forced the hand of a reluctant government.

Phase II: The £20 Million Extortion and the Two-Century Debt

The ultimate proof of who belonged to the oppressor class and who belonged to the liberators was permanently recorded in the financial ledgers of the state. When the Slavery Abolition Act was finally forced through in 1833, the ruling controllers protected their own pockets at the expense of the public.

The British government granted no restitution to the freed slaves. Instead, the elite executed a massive financial bail-out for themselves, voting to pay £20 million in compensation to wealthy slave-owning families for the loss of their "human property." To raise this sum, 40% of the government's annual budget, the state took out a monumental loan, placing the financial burden onto the British taxpayer through generations of aggressive taxation.

The historical irony is absolute. The descendants of the very labourers who fought to abolish slavery were forced to pay the interest on the compensation bill handed to the plantation barons. This monumental debt was so deeply embedded that it was not fully cleared by the British public until 2015.

Phase III: The Starvation Blockade (1861–1865)

The moral climax of this defiance was forged in the crucible of the Lancashire Cotton Famine during the American Civil War. In the early 1860s, Abraham Lincoln’s naval blockade of the Confederate South choked off the supply of slave-grown cotton to Northern England.

The elite media and mill owners expected the workforce to riot against the blockade. The Confederacy openly bragged that hunger would force the British worker to demand the Royal Navy smash Lincoln’s ships. They completely underestimated the fierce, ideological discipline of the early union engineers.

Faced with a brutal ultimatum- their own survival versus complicity in enslavement- the working communities took an unyielding stand. They looked at the raw cotton and refused to touch it. Over sixty percent of the region's machinery fell silent. Hundreds of thousands of families were plunged into absolute destitution, surviving on meagre soup kitchens while the wealthy masters hoarded their capital. Yet, the workers refused to crack.

Conclusion: The Unbroken Thread

To tell the British people today that they carry the hereditary guilt of the slave trade is a psychological weapon designed to strip them of their historical identity. The ordinary people of Britain did not run the slave empire; they were the force that fractured it.

Restoring this history is not just about correcting the record; it is about reclaiming the stolen valour of the working class and taking back the moral armour that belongs to the people.

The President's Thanks

On January 19, 1863, Lincoln took the unprecedented step of bypassing the British government to reply directly to the people in a letter addressed to the Working-Men of Manchester. He wrote:

"I know and deeply deplore the sufferings which the working-men at Manchester, and in all Europe, are called to endure in this crisis... I cannot but regard your decisive utterances upon the question as an instance of sublime Christian heroism which has not been surpassed in any age or in any country."

If you walk into Manchester today, you will find a statue of Abraham Lincoln in Lincoln  Square with these exact words carved into the plinth. It stands as permanent, physical proof of the truth: the working class did not profit from the slave empire; they were the ones who broke it. My Writing

He Who Pays the Piper: Is Billionaire Philanthropy Killing Bishop Auckland's Economy?

The Return of the Prince Bishop: Does Philanthrocapitalism Actually Benefit Bishop Auckland?

For centuries, Bishop Auckland was ruled from Auckland Castle by the Prince Bishops—men who held immense, concentrated wealth and total civic authority over the local population. Walking through the market square today, you could be forgiven for thinking that the feudal era has returned. Only this time, the "prince" isn’t a man of the cloth; he is a City of London investment manager, and his domain is built on an intricate web of tax-exempt charities, six-figure executive salaries, and an army of over 1,000 unpaid workers.

The driving force behind this modern transformation is multimillionaire Jonathan Ruffer, whose fortune has peaked at an estimated £380 million. By pouring over £200 million of his personal wealth into regional heritage and tourism projects—most notably 11Arches and the blockbuster live-action show, Kynren—Ruffer has been widely lauded as the savior of a post-industrial Northern town left behind by successive governments.

But as the old proverb goes: he who pays the piper calls the tune. When an entire town's regeneration relies on a single billionaire’s wallet, we must look past the spectacular pyrotechnics and ask a difficult economic question: Does this model truly benefit the everyday people of Bishop Auckland if the vast majority of the jobs are entirely voluntary?

The Premium Attraction Powered by Free Labor

From a theatrical standpoint, Kynren is a masterpiece. But from a labor perspective, its operational structure raises significant ethical questions. The premium, ticketed attraction generates millions in revenue, yet it officially employs a core, year-round team of just 22 paid staff members.

The heavy lifting of staging these massive productions is handed to over 1,000 volunteers, affectionately known as the "Archers." These individuals act, manage complex pyrotechnics, handle cavalry horses, staff security, and run hospitality—all for zero financial remuneration. While the charity provides on-site food and basic refreshments to comply with volunteer guidelines, critics argue that this framework systematically bypasses the National Living Wage in a region that desperately needs stable, paid employment. By substituting a professional, paid workforce with volunteers, the project effectively reduces the number of commercial jobs a tourist attraction of this scale would traditionally inject into the local economy.

The Contrast: 0% Tax vs. Six-Figure Payrolls

The disparity becomes even sharper when examining the top tier of the 11Arches payroll. While 1,000 locals work for free, official Charity Commission records show a heavily top-heavy financial structure. The organization's highest-paid executive commands a salary bracket between £400,000 and £450,000 per year, with other senior directors taking home six-figure packages.

Furthermore, because 11Arches operates as a registered charity, it maximizes every available legal tax loophole:

• 0% Corporate Tax: The charity pays no corporate tax on its primary show earnings and ticket sales.
• Bypassing Payroll Taxes: Operating with 1,000+ volunteers means 11Arches avoids the 13.8% employer Class 1 National Insurance contributions that a standard commercial business would pay for its staff.

Under UK charity law, Ruffer cannot personally pocket these untaxed profits due to an "asset lock." However, by using restricted donations and inter-charity transfers, he retains total executive control over where those millions go—giving a single private individual unchecked power to reshape the town's physical and economic identity to his personal tastes.

A Prince Without the Bishop: Neutralizing Democracy

Perhaps the most concerning element of this "philanthrocapitalism" is how it has successfully neutralized traditional democratic accountability and influenced local policy. To ensure his vision faced zero political friction, Ruffer’s charity network historically embedded the local political establishment into its inner circle. Official records show that Helen Goodman, the sitting MP for Bishop Auckland at the time, was appointed as a founding Director and Trustee of The Auckland Project in 2012. When the person elected to protect workers' rights is a trustee for the town's largest private landlord, the line between public governance and private enterprise erases.

Today, Durham County Council is heavily dependent on Ruffer's capital. This power dynamic was laid bare when Ruffer threatened to "turn off his tap" of £50,000-a-day in local funding during a row over Levelling Up funds. Consequently, public infrastructure policy has warped to suit the logistics of 11Arches—funneling millions into massive riverside parking and traffic systems rather than addressing basic community amenities for residents.

History Repeating Itself

Ruffer is executing a 21st-century replay of a playbook written inside the castle walls during the Napoleonic Wars. Then-Prince Bishop Shute Barrington used absolute executive power to crush local strikes and forced workers back to the pits. The historical parallel is striking: two hundred years ago, the master of Auckland Castle used immense, untaxed wealth to bypass democratic accountability and dictate terms to the local workforce. By securing royal patronage alongside a sitting MP on his board, Ruffer's empire has effectively insulated itself from scrutiny, transforming a personal passion project into an untouchable establishment crusade.

Civic Pride or Economic Mirage?

Defenders of the project point out that volunteers enjoy the social connection and training provided. But pride doesn't pay the gas bill. Bishop Auckland has been gifted a stunning cultural veneer, but the wealth generated by the town's collective effort is tightly locked within a private charitable empire. When a multimillionaire uses free labor to build a tax-exempt tourism hub, the town isn't being regenerated by democratic design—it is being remade in the image of a single benefactor.

The "Prince Bishop" model dominates the landscape, evidenced by the fate of Binchester Roman Fort. In 2014, Ruffer’s Auckland Project bought the land, and the council—crippled by budget deficits—surrendered public management. From the medieval castle to the Roman fort, the town's democratic public spaces have steadily become the exclusive property of a billionaire's trust.

The Prince & The King 

There is extensive documentation of a long-standing collaborative relationship and mutual praise between Jonathan Ruffer and King Charles III:

1. The Royal Arts Philanthropy Medal: In 2011, Prince Charles presented Ruffer with the Prince of Wales Medal for Arts Philanthropy after Ruffer spent £15 million to rescue the historic Zurbarán paintings.
2. High-Profile Royal Visits: From the 2012 Auckland Castle tour to the 2022 opening of the Spanish Gallery, the King has personally visited to laud Ruffer's investments.
3. Institutional Backing: The Prince's Trust has worked directly with Ruffer’s team to inject its employment and training schemes into the Auckland Castle development.

---

Author's Note: I don't have anything against Ruffer or the charities if they bring money into Bishop Auckland, but it is a concern when one multimillionaire thrives while the rest of the town is struggling.

#Philanthrocapitalism #LivingWage #WorkersRights #TaxAvoidance #CharityScrutiny #PoliticalAccountability #BishopAuckland #CountyDurham #NorthEastEngland #Kynren #11Arches #AucklandProject My Website

The Budget, Different colour ties, same old routine.

Originally written in 2012. Revisited in 2026 because the story hasn’t changed — only the cast.

2026 Reflection — Fourteen Years Later

Fourteen years on, and nothing has changed. The faces behind the dispatch box are different, the slogans have been rebranded, but the script is identical. Every Budget still dresses inequality up as “responsibility,” still squeezes the people who can’t avoid it, and still rewards the ones who can.

Back in 2012, I wrote this, thinking the country might eventually wake up. Instead, the same tricks still work, the same headlines still distract, and the same people still walk away untouched. If anything, the gap between political theatre and real life has grown wider.

The actors change. The incentives don’t..Nothing has changed since 2012.  More of My work

How good is The EU for employment ?

We are constantly told by the Coalition government & their friends in some large corporations that if we left the EU many jobs would be lost.

The UK government has procured £300 million pounds of Propaganda money from the EU to promote it to us before a Potential referendum that many of us with a modicum of intelligence do not believe will ever materialize.

Lets look at some evidence that would suggest the opposite of what we are being told  about employment in the UK & the other European countries in the Euro for instance.
First of all http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22727373 I will also add this link to The commissions own info Just to be fair.
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics

And Britains. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/lms/labour-market-statistics/june-2013/statistical-bulletin.html

The worst unemployment is for those aged 16-24 in the UK is 22.4%.The  Eurozone it is 23.8%. 
The youth unemployment here in the UK will get even worse in January when there will be a massive influx of cheap Labour from Bulgaria & Romania. We don't know how many are coming but I would guess at maybe over the next year or so maybe 250.000. Our government is saying that not as many as the Polish influx over half a million in 8 years.
I Beg to differ as the minimum wage in Poland  is more than double that of Romania & nearly 3 times that of Bulgaria. This is the list of minimum wages as of 2010. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_in_Europe_by_minimum_wage
Our UK minimum wage is more than 10 times that of those countries.
Another thing to remember is that many Polish people are claiming child benefit for children that do not even live here & send it back to Poland. Do you think for even a millisecond that Bulgarians & Romanians have not heard of this?
When these people do come here they will happily live just like the first Poles who lived  10 people to a house & take minimum wage jobs that just a few years ago our school leavers would take on the first step of the working ladder. IE bar work, Waiting jobs & hotel cleaners, Cleaning jobs & so on. Our wonderful leaders & other Pro European commentators like to tell us that our kids are lazy & lack motivation to work. This is more Propaganda led by the likes of the Labour party who have spent the last 50 years undermining the working classes in Britain while forcing through an open door immigration policy.
When I left school in 1983 my first job was washing pots in a Turkish owned Burger bar in Bromley Kent. I didn't really like the job & was hardly in my career dream jobs but it was that all important  first job & unlike Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Nick Clegg & Ed Milliband who have never had proper jobs & born with silver spoons I needed to pay my way.
Our leaders Like Cameron ,Clegg & Milliband Never(nor will their Children) have to compete with Immigrants for jobs housing or doctors,dentists or school places.

What of the scaremongering of the pro  EU brigade about jobs being lost. Well in the 70 my grandparents generation voted for a Common Market trade agreement see http://www.europedia.moussis.eu/books/Book_2/3/6/?all=1 read this as well http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/archive/online_resources/foyle_foundation/common_market.aspx

The EU we see today is as a result of the lisbon Treaty http://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/understanding-the-lisbon-treaty

Do you believe that by leaving the EU the member states will say ? No we don't want to buy or sell with you any more. We don't want to profit by running your Water ,Gas or electric companies. We don't want to profit from your rail or bus services. We don't want to sell you our food Beer or cars.
Our government & the EU would have you believe this to continue the gravy train for the likes of Germany with its 5% unemployment. The EU superstate cost Brits like You & I £65 billion a year some people believe its more like £110 billion & we get a lot less in return for our investment than many countries in the EU.

All in all we must not be conned into staying part of this failed project to rule Europe with as was wanted by the Germans in 2 world wars which failed due to the courage of our US allies & fellow European countries. We must not allow ourselves to be manipulated into staying part of the the ECHR which allows criminals to escape punishment & extradition, costing us millions & allowing Murderers & rapists to stay putting our families at risk.

None of us have voted for it and was forced through by Gordon the Moron Brown on his way to bankrupting Britain.

We want Out of the EU superstate now We want a referendum & we want it NOW.
The Only way to get a vote or to get out is to vote UKIP at every opportunity.

/

The Budget

No surprises for me in the budget robbing the hard working in our communities while putting more money in the pockets of the rich. The new 45p rate for top earners is great because any of those earning in excess of £150.000 will already have their avoidance in place all this new rate does is gives them more money to avoid paying tax on. Now don't get me wrong if i could afford to pay an accountant to save my money I would as I believe we all would given the opportunity.

First of all how can leaders who have never had a proper job empathise with the hard working among us. You see Dave is the son of a gambler sorry stockbroker and even blue blooded if wikipedia is correct. Like many in politics today Public school education and never had a job where there was any chance of getting their lillywhite hands dirty. The mantra of  "we are all in this together" is a joke. I cant go into work and demand they pay my travel costs, or pay for my breakfast and lunch and many MPs  claim  upto £400 a month for food alone. I cant afford to eat out at lunchtime so I bring a packed lunch so why cant our MP's do the same? They eat at subsidised restaurants worth up to £5.7m a year  . Do you think this is acceptable when we are losing our jobs and paying through the nose for everything ?
Are we really all in it together when for instance our Mp's can smoke inside but for smokers of which I am not one cannot.
They call us racists when we suggest that people from eastern Europe are taking many jobs at the expense of British people who want to work. But then our politicians are not having to compete with these Immigrants for their jobs.
They complain about those claiming benefits a situation that has been created by successive governments. Our politicians have created a dependency a bit like a drug dealer giving someone free drugs and then calling them a junkie when they need more. We have seen in the paper that young people will have to work until they are 80 years old before they can retire , is it any wonder? You have women getting pregnant year in and year out by different fathers and we have to support each child for the next 18 years.  The majority of these mothers of these kids will never ever work and the fathers are not seen for dust. The whole situation is unsustainable but nothing will be done because they are all potential state dependent voters.
On April the 6th we will be able to to earn £8,105 before we have to pay any tax then next April the amount rises to £9,205 which is nice but with a possible 2 budgets after yesterdays that will be clawed back in other taxes.
Petrol is already £1.40 a litre with another 3.2p in duty going on in august and that without more rises before then. Now for me this is not a problem as I neither need or want to own a car as I cycle 30 miles a day to work and back keeping me fit and healthy, however like benefits people are rightly or wrongly dependent on their cars.
I don't smoke either but nicotine this deadly legal drug the most addictive known to man is profited by the worlds governments  and an extra 37p on a pack will make a pretty penny for our government. I for one think this is obscene and belittles our governments claims to a war on drugs. 
I don't have any kids either so I personally don't want to pay for other peoples. Now telling those that pay a fortune in taxes ie those earning more than £50.000 a year that they will no longer be getting something THEY DO pay for is not the best way to motivate people to work hard.

My real problem though is the government we have in place. Now for me the name of the party is now irrelevant  Labour , Conservative Lib Dems are all the same which really explains the hung parliament at the election. Dave lets face it is just Tony B liar with a blue tie. The only reason he is prime minister is that Nick Clegg preferred to do an under the table deal with him instead of Gordon Brown and the Labour party. The truth of the matter is we trust none of them but in general the British electorate are cowards and will still vote for where their perceived class affiliation directs them or the party their Parents, Grandparents or great grandparents voted for. Until the electorate use their brains things will never change. The amount of people I know that say we need to be out of the EU which is costing us £50m a day and is basicly a dictatorship ruled over us by the Germans and to a smaller degree the French. The same germany that tried and failed thanks to millions of brave men and women to conquer us and the rest of Europe twice in the last hundred years with guns, bombs and tanks have now succeded with a pen. We in last few months have seen what this dictatorship has done in 2 countries Greece and Italy 2 elected officials removed and 2 Euro huggers put in their place. Why are we in general blind to these facts? Just like Britain they now have in place Unelected prime ministers. The Eu is an unelected body living off hard working Europeans suffering hardship while they eat and drink and Travel at the peoples expense. Once again just like our parliament they are allowed to smoke in the building but disallow ordinary smokers thruout Europe to do the same. Truly a dictatorship.
OUr citizens need to wake up and stop taking all this lying down , we as a nation need to take our country back before its too late.